- What are three things that you would like behavioral and brain scientists to know about FABBS?
First, FABBS is most effective when member societies and individual scientists stay engaged. Advocacy works best when it reflects the full breadth of our community. Second, FABBS does far more than respond to crises; much of its most important work happens quietly and proactively, shaping conversations before decisions are made. Third, FABBS is not just about funding—it is about ensuring that behavioral and brain science has a seat at the table when society grapples with its most complex problems.
2. What, in your opinion, are some of the biggest challenges facing behavioral and cognitive scientists in 2026?
One major challenge is uncertainty and instability in federal research funding, combined with increasing pressure to demonstrate immediate “impact.” Another is the growing politicization of science, particularly research on behavior, identity, health, and social systems. We also face a communication challenge: our findings are often nuanced and probabilistic, which can be difficult to convey in policy environments that favor simple answers. Last but not least, new technologies—especially AI—are transforming how science is conducted, raising both exciting opportunities and serious ethical and methodological questions.
3. How do you hope FABBS can assist in some of those challenges?
FABBS can help by continuing to translate complex science into clear, policy-relevant messages without oversimplifying it. By maintaining strong relationships with federal agencies and congressional staff, FABBS ensures that behavioral and brain science is part of the conversation when priorities are set. FABBS can also help protect the integrity of our fields by advocating for rigorous, independent science and by pushing back—collectively—against efforts to marginalize or misrepresent our work.
4. What motivated you to become President of the FABBS board?
FABBS occupies a uniquely important space at the intersection of science and policy. Over the years, I’ve seen how much difference it makes when behavioral and brain scientists speak with a coordinated, informed voice in Washington. I was motivated to step into this role because I believe strongly that our fields—psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and related disciplines—have never been more relevant to the challenges facing society. I wanted to help ensure that this advocacy remains strong, visible, and forward-looking at a moment when evidence-based science is especially needed.
5. What do you hope to accomplish during your two years in this role?
My primary goal is to strengthen FABBS as a platform for collective action. That means helping member societies work together across subfields, clarifying shared priorities, and communicating more clearly why behavioral and brain science matters for national well-being. I also hope to broaden the ways FABBS engages with emerging areas—such as AI, mental health, social cohesion, and public trust—where our science has clear policy relevance but is not always fully recognized.
In conclusion, let me reiterate that I’m grateful for the opportunity to serve, and I look forward to working with the FABBS community over the coming years.
